Skip to content

Restaurant Brand Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDD’s) and owner shuffles

How Burger King’s 2024 FDD Reveals a Massive Ownership Shakeup

Reported and written by Joe Dunbar, Director of Data, RestaurantData.com

Burger King’s 2024 Franchise Disclosure Document reveals a substantial restructuring of the brand’s U.S. franchise system. RestaurantData identified 405 Burger King restaurants that ceased operations and another 302 locations that transferred ownership. Together, those 707 restaurants represented approximately 10% of the disclosed U.S. system.

Key Findings

  • 405 Burger King restaurants, or 5.8% of the disclosed system, ceased operations.
  • 302 restaurants, or 4.3% of the system, transferred to different owners.
  • Approximately two-thirds of the restaurants that closed or transferred were connected to just 10 franchisee organizations.
  • Several large Burger King franchisees disappeared from the 2024 FDD following bankruptcies, auctions, asset sales, corporate repurchases, or brand exits.
  • Restaurant Brands International acquired Carrols Restaurant Group, Burger King’s largest U.S. franchisee, in a transaction valued at approximately $1 billion.
  • The ownership changes demonstrate how a restaurant can remain open while its franchisee, corporate parent, and hierarchical connections change substantially.

The Burger King findings are part of a broader RestaurantData review of franchise systems over multiple filing periods. The recently published Franchise Disclosure Documents Multi-Year Growth Summary examines how seven prominent franchise brands changed between 2021 and 2025, including unit growth, franchisee activity, closures, development pipelines, and changes in company-owned and franchised locations.

From Carrols to Burger King

Carrols served burgers, fries, and shakes to customers for takeout. Most people dined in their cars. The food was fast, tasty, and inexpensive. Our family of seven could dine for less than $6. Whenever we drove down to Schenectady, we went hungry and stopped for lunch at Carrols.

In the 1970s, Carrols converted most of its locations to Burger King restaurants. My college friends and I loved the Burger King in Utica, New York. We liked the “Have It Your Way” motto and ordered burgers loaded with extra tomatoes and mayonnaise.

Over time, Carrols became Burger King’s largest franchisee, operating more than 1,000 locations. In early 2024, Burger King parent Restaurant Brands International acquired all outstanding shares of Carrols Restaurant Group in a transaction valued at approximately $1 billion.

The acquisition followed a period in which several high-volume Burger King franchisees entered bankruptcy, sold restaurants through auctions, transferred locations to other operators, or left the system entirely. The 2024 FDD provides a structured view of how widespread those ownership changes became.

The 10 Franchisee Groups Behind Most Closures and Transfers

Approximately 470 of the Burger King restaurants that closed or transferred were associated with 10 franchisee groups. This concentration shows that a relatively small number of operator-level events can reshape ownership across hundreds of individual restaurant locations.

  • Premier Kings sold 150 restaurants through an auction in February 2024. Its remaining Burger King locations closed.
  • Meridian Restaurants Unlimited sold 70 of its 91 restaurants through an auction. Buyers included Burger King corporate and several established franchisees.
  • Toms King sold its Burger King locations to several buyers for approximately $33 million.
  • EYM Group no longer includes Burger King among the restaurant brands listed in its operating portfolio.
  • Seven Restaurants, NDM Restaurants, NKS Restaurants, HR Restaurants, and Southern King Holdings had no remaining restaurants listed in the 2024 Burger King FDD.

These company-level changes are organized within Atlas by RestaurantData , which connects restaurant locations, franchisees, brands, operating companies, parent organizations, and executive contacts. This structure allows researchers to move upward from an individual restaurant to its franchisee and parent company or downward from an ownership group to the locations it controls.

How Franchisee Location Reassignments Work

When a franchisee exits a restaurant brand through a closure, asset sale, bankruptcy, corporate repurchase, or negotiated transfer, its locations may follow several different paths. A restaurant can close permanently, transfer to another franchisee, return temporarily to corporate ownership, or reopen under a different operator.

A location transfer does not necessarily mean that the restaurant itself closed. The sign, menu, employees, and customer experience may remain substantially the same while the legal owner and operating organization change. That distinction is important when evaluating franchisee counts, ownership concentration, location continuity, and company-level expansion.

The diagram below illustrates three types of changes identified in the 2024 Burger King FDD: locations reassigned to another franchisee, a restaurant reported as closed, and locations transferred back to Burger King corporate.

Burger King Franchisee Location Reassignments

BK franchisee EYM owned these two stores. Both were reassigned to new BK franchisee Union Burgers.

EYM
30711 Southfield Rd
Southfield, MI
Location ID 223344
EYM
2411 E 8 Mile Rd
Warren, MI
Location ID 445566
↓ ↓
Reassigned to New BK Franchisee Union Burgers
Franchisee HQ ID 376488

BK franchisee Toms King owned this restaurant, which was reported as closed.

Toms King
414 Water St
Chardon, OH
Location ID 556677
CLOSED

Seven Restaurants Group owned these two stores. Both were reassigned to Burger King corporate.

Seven Restaurants Group
1445 W Sunrise Blvd
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Location ID 778899
Seven Restaurants Group
1701 S Federal Hwy
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Location ID 995566
↓ ↓
Reassigned to Burger King Corporate
HQ ID 8567990

What the Ownership Changes Indicate

The movement of hundreds of Burger King locations illustrates why restaurant-unit counts alone do not provide a complete view of a franchise system. A brand can report thousands of operating restaurants while experiencing significant changes beneath the brand level, including franchisee exits, ownership consolidation, corporate intervention, market withdrawals, and transfers to better-capitalized operators.

Transfers can also change the purchasing structure surrounding a restaurant. A location that moves from a smaller franchisee to a large multi-unit organization may become part of a centralized system for equipment, technology, food purchasing, facilities management, construction, and professional services.

RestaurantData evaluates verified development activity across growing companies through the Expansion Pressure Index™ . The index is a business-prioritization model rather than a prediction of future performance. It helps distinguish companies demonstrating continuing verified development activity from organizations associated with isolated openings or announcements.

Larger franchise organizations, parent companies, and multi-concept ownership groups are also examined through the Restaurant Enterprise Index™ . The index generally covers organizations responsible for 100 or more restaurant units and provides a company-level view that is separate from an individual restaurant-brand ranking.

RestaurantData’s Top 100 Restaurant Franchisors research provides an additional view of the companies responsible for major restaurant franchise systems, including the relationships among franchisors, restaurant brands, franchise operators, and individual locations.

Reclaim the Flame: Burger King’s Strategic Turnaround

Burger King has been implementing a strategic turnaround known as Reclaim the Flame. The program includes restaurant remodeling, equipment investments, updated technology, advertising, operational improvements, and changes intended to strengthen franchisee performance.

Locations transferred to Burger King corporate may be remodeled or operationally stabilized before being sold to new or existing franchisees. The 2024 FDD already reflects the entrance of additional multi-unit franchisees and the reassignment of restaurants previously controlled by operators that exited the system.

RestaurantData will continue tracking Burger King ownership changes, corporate acquisitions, restaurant transfers, closures, and franchisee additions through company disclosures, public records, operating-location research, and subsequent Franchise Disclosure Documents.

How RestaurantData Tracks FDD Ownership Changes

RestaurantData ingests and organizes new-unit records, closed-location records, franchisee changes, corporate ownership changes, and hierarchical connections across more than 135 restaurant brands. In cases such as Burger King, the work includes identifying when corporate takes locations back from a franchisee, retains them as company-owned restaurants, closes them, or reassigns them to another operator.

RestaurantData receives and reviews updated FDD documents for tracked brands each year. The primary restaurant FDD filing period generally runs from February through May. From spring through early summer, the research team compares disclosed outlets, identifies openings and closures, reviews ownership changes, and investigates broken or newly created hierarchical connections.

The broader Restaurant Franchise FDD Analysis reviews current filings across multiple restaurant brands, including disclosed unit counts, franchised and company-owned locations, development agreements, growth rates, and financial-performance information when available.

Additional methodology papers, franchise-ownership studies, company research, opening analyses, executive-movement reports, and proprietary indexes are organized within the RestaurantData Research Center .

Related Franchise and Ownership Research

Burger King’s ownership restructuring can be viewed alongside RestaurantData’s multi-year analysis of Franchise Disclosure Documents from 2021 through 2025 . That report follows several restaurant franchise systems through periods of rapid growth, stabilization, closures, franchisee additions, signed development pipelines, and changes between franchised and company-owned restaurants.

Readers comparing Burger King with other major franchise brands can also review RestaurantData’s analysis of leading restaurant franchise brands by FDD unit count . That research compares franchised and company-owned restaurants, geographic coverage, service categories, ownership structures, and disclosed operating information across large franchise systems.

Franchisee transfers also connect to a broader shift toward larger and more diversified operating organizations. RestaurantData’s study of multi-concept restaurant operators examines companies that control multiple restaurant concepts, legal entities, executive structures, and location networks. This company-level view helps explain why the transfer of a restaurant from one franchisee to another can alter purchasing authority, corporate relationships, market coverage, and the identity of the organization making operating decisions.

Research Franchise Ownership Changes

RestaurantData tracks FDD filings, franchisee ownership changes, location reassignments, closures, parent companies, and hierarchical relationships across more than 135 restaurant brands.

Request Access

Usage & Distribution Terms

This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis.

Preferred citation: Source: RestaurantData.com, How Burger King’s 2024 FDD Reveals a Massive Ownership Shakeup, reported and written by Joe Dunbar, Director of Data.

Restaurant POS Multi-Unit Market Share by Metro Area

Which POS Systems Lead New York, LA, Chicago, Dallas and Houston?

This report analyzes restaurant POS system market share across the Top 5 U.S. metropolitan areas: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, and Houston. The analysis covers 43,329 total restaurant locations in brands operating 5 or more units. NCR/Aloha leads all five markets with 11,807 installs. New York is the largest single market with 10,455 locations tracked.

Key findings: The top 10 POS systems account for 84.24% of all installs. 11.67% are In-House/Proprietary. NCR/Voyix operates under the Aloha brand in restaurant POS. See also: Next 5 U.S. Metro Markets →

Key Market Observations

New York is the largest single market with 10,455 total locations tracked, followed by Los Angeles at 10,020. NCR/Aloha has its highest count in New York with 3,504 installs.

NCR/Aloha leads every market in this group. Its highest counts are in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Dallas, and Houston, in that order.

Toast has its highest count in Los Angeles with 932 installs, followed by New York with 748. Its counts in Chicago, Dallas, and Houston are lower and relatively similar.

PAR is strongest in Los Angeles and Dallas with 799 and 728 installs respectively. Chicago is the lowest PAR market in this group at 265 installs.

In-House/Proprietary ranks third overall with 5,055 installs across the five markets. This category reflects the scale impact of large restaurant companies using custom or internally managed POS platforms.

Top 10 POS Systems Combined Share Across All 5 Metros

The table below shows combined unit counts and totals for the top 10 POS systems plus other providers across New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, and Houston.

Source: RestaurantData.com Fall 2024 POS Survey · Top 5 U.S. metro areas · Brands with 5+ units · Survey ending August 15, 2024 · 75.8% penetration rate

POS System Chicago Dallas Houston Los Angeles New York Totals
NCR / Aloha 2,474 2,007 1,647 2,175 3,504 11,807
Oracle / Micros 964 1,071 772 1,457 1,418 5,682
In-House / Proprietary 984 915 894 1,243 1,019 5,055
Toast 419 429 400 932 748 2,928
PAR 265 728 681 799 305 2,778
Focus 368 369 440 554 509 2,240
NewPOS 475 307 294 405 473 1,954
Poseidon 343 413 364 482 335 1,937
QU 130 261 194 218 443 1,246
Revel 116 197 200 145 217 875
Top 10 POS Systems 6,538 6,697 5,886 8,410 8,971 36,502
Other POS Systems 1,522 1,299 912 1,610 1,484 6,827
Grand Totals 8,060 7,996 6,798 10,020 10,455 43,329

* Unit counts reflect restaurant locations using each POS system within chains operating 5 or more units. Survey ending August 15, 2024. Revised September 10, 2024 for brands where franchisees can choose their own POS. Source: RestaurantData.com primary research via telephone interviews and in-store visits.

Survey Methodology

  • Total brands surveyed: 3,155 unique restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units
  • Results obtained: 2,391 brands responded
  • Penetration success rate: 75.8%
  • Survey duration: 4 months, ending August 15, 2024
  • Recent revisions: Edits for brands where franchisees can choose their own POS, September 10, 2024
  • Method: Telephone interviews and in-store visits; each brand contacted at least twice, up to 8 calls if needed
  • Top 10 POS systems: 84.24% of all installs; 11.67% are In-House/Proprietary

Additional Restaurant POS Market Share Research

Restaurant POS market share changes by geography, operator size, ownership structure, and chain footprint. For the next tier of major U.S. markets, see RestaurantData’s analysis of restaurant POS market share across Atlanta, Washington, Phoenix, Miami, Detroit, and Riverside.

For companies evaluating chain-level restaurant technology coverage, RestaurantData also maintains restaurant POS data for chain and group installs, including provider information tied to multi-unit restaurant operators.

Install counts can also be reviewed by provider. The top restaurant POS companies by install count report summarizes provider-level coverage across restaurants with 5 or more units.

For a broader provider view from the Fall 2024 survey, see the Top 30 restaurant POS companies ranking based on RestaurantData install research.

Usage and Distribution Terms

This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis.

Preferred citation: “Source: RestaurantData.com, Restaurant POS Market Share Across New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, and Houston, published on the original publication date shown on this page.”

Top 30 Restaurant POS Companies by Location Installs- Fall 2024 Survey

Which POS Systems Have the Most Restaurant Location Installs?

The rankings below reflect the top 30 restaurant POS companies in the U.S. by number of location installations, based on primary research across 3,155 unique restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units. NCR/Aloha leads with 55,536 units across 704 chains representing nearly 20% of the surveyed market.

Have a quota? Sell against a particular POS brand? Integrate with a POS partner? We have the HQs, locations, and contacts using POS technology. Contact us to improve your sales outreach.

The table below ranks POS providers by total U.S. restaurant location installs across chains with 5+ units, showing number of chains using each system, total unit installs, and market share percentage.

Source: RestaurantData.com Fall 2024 POS Survey · 3,155 brands surveyed · 5+ unit chains · Survey period: 4 months ending August 15, 2024 · 75.8% penetration rate

# POS System Chains Units % Share
1 NCR / Aloha 704 55,536 19.70%
2 Micros / Oracle 317 39,978 14.18%
3 In-House / Proprietary 15 35,705 12.66%
4 PAR 101 21,549 7.64%
5 Focus 75 18,595 6.60%
6 NewPOS 2 15,339 5.44%
7 Poseidon 2 14,578 5.17%
8 Toast 1,266 11,829 4.20%
9 QU 23 6,493 2.30%
10 Panasonic 31 5,810 2.06%
11 RDS 5 4,618 1.64%
12 Clover 116 4,182 1.48%
13 Revel 76 3,831 1.36%
14 ELO 18 3,528 1.25%
15 Square 102 2,884 1.02%
16 Posiflex 19 2,851 1.01%
17 PDQ 2 2,753 0.98%
18 Tray 2 1,799 0.64%
19 Positouch 91 1,487 0.53%
20 HungerRush 29 1,271 0.45%
21 Givex 37 1,099 0.39%
22 Register 119 979 0.35%
23 Squirrel 37 951 0.34%
24 Various 18 919 0.33%
25 Heartland 64 857 0.30%
26 Maxpro 2 717 0.25%
27 Maitre’D / Moneris 14 707 0.25%
28 Foodtec 19 692 0.25%
29 Auphan 8 602 0.21%

* Rankings by total unit installs across chains with 5+ units. Chains = number of unique restaurant brands using each POS system. Units = total location installs. Source: RestaurantData.com Fall 2024 POS Survey, ending August 15, 2024. Note: Register and Various categories were subsequently removed and consolidated in the Spring 2025 survey update.

Survey Methodology

This survey represents one of the most comprehensive independent studies of restaurant POS installations ever conducted. Rather than relying on vendor-reported figures or software estimates, RestaurantData.com used direct primary research to verify POS usage at each chain.

  • Total brands surveyed: 3,155 unique restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units
  • Results obtained: 2,391 brands responded
  • Penetration success rate: 75.8%
  • Survey duration: 4 months, ending August 15, 2024
  • Method: Telephone interviews and in-store visits; each brand contacted at least twice, up to four times if needed

Key Observations from the Fall 2024 Survey

NCR/Aloha dominates by unit count with 55,536 installs across 704 chains, nearly 20% of the surveyed market. However, Toast leads by chain count with 1,266 chains, reflecting its strong penetration among smaller and mid-size operators even though its average install size per chain is smaller.

In-House/Proprietary ranks #3 by unit count (35,705) despite only 15 chains reflecting the enormous scale of a small number of large chains that have built their own POS systems. This category has grown significantly and was expanded in the subsequent Spring 2025 survey.

See the updated Spring 2025 results: Top POS Companies — Spring 2025 Survey →

Sell Into POS-Specific Restaurant Chains?

Whether you have a quota against a particular POS brand, integrate with a POS partner, or want to target chains using specific technology — RestaurantData.com has the HQ contacts, location data, and decision-maker information you need. Contact us to improve your sales outreach.

Contact Us Now →

U.S. Restaurant Counts: New Openings and Closures 2024 Data

U.S. Restaurant Landscape: Key Numbers and Trends

As of August 1, 2024, there were 786,206 restaurants operating in the United States. New openings were running at a steady pace of 550–650 new locations per week, while RestaurantData’s review of restaurant closure activity showed no significant acceleration in closures compared with prior periods.

Data as of August 1, 2024. Opening counts are sourced from weekly legal-filing analysis by RestaurantData.com. Closure data is based on reviews of Yelp, Google Maps, OpenTable, and TripAdvisor. For a longer historical view, see 4.5 Years of New Restaurant Opening Trends .

Key Observations

Independent restaurants dominated both openings and closures. Independent operators represented the large majority of new restaurant openings during the period, but they also accounted for most recorded closures. Of the 15,977 restaurant closures identified during the first half of 2024, 83% involved independent establishments, representing 13,265 locations. Chain restaurants accounted for the remaining 17%, representing 2,712 locations.

The chain share of new restaurant openings declined substantially. Before the pandemic, restaurant chains accounted for approximately 25–33% of new locations. During the period covered by this report, that share had fallen to approximately 10–12%, reflecting increased independent restaurant activity and more selective development strategies among established chains.

Restaurant closures increased from the first quarter to the second quarter. RestaurantData identified 7,021 closures from January through March 2024 and 8,956 closures from April through June. The second-quarter total was approximately 27% higher than the first-quarter total.

The closure data did not indicate a nationwide collapse in restaurant activity. Although closures remained substantial, the reviewed data did not show a sharp break from prior operating patterns. Restaurant openings continued at a steady weekly pace, demonstrating that closures and new development were occurring at the same time across different markets, concepts, and operator groups.

RestaurantData’s current research framework extends beyond individual opening and closure counts. Verified locations, restaurant brands, franchise relationships, operating companies, and parent organizations are organized within Atlas by RestaurantData , which connects restaurant locations with the companies and ownership structures responsible for their operation.

New Restaurant Openings

A steady pace of 550–650 new restaurant locations were opening each week across the United States during the period covered by this report. This represented a meaningful increase from the 500-plus weekly average seen in 2023, reflecting continued recovery, replacement activity, entrepreneurship, and expansion within the foodservice market.

Chain versus independent openings: A notable shift occurred in the composition of new openings following the pandemic:

  • Approximately 10–12% of new openings were chain restaurants, a significant decrease from pre-pandemic levels.
  • Before the pandemic, chains accounted for approximately 25–33% of all new restaurant locations.
  • Independent operators represented the large majority of new openings, reflecting continued entrepreneurial activity within the foodservice sector.

The shift toward independent and smaller multi-unit operators is also visible in RestaurantData’s research on restaurant multi-concept operators . That analysis examines how restaurant companies expand from a single concept into organizations operating multiple brands, legal entities, and location networks.

U.S. Restaurant Closures During the First Half of 2024

Restaurant closures remained a significant part of the U.S. foodservice landscape during the first half of 2024. RestaurantData identified 15,977 restaurant closures from January through June based on a review of operating-status information available through Yelp, Google Maps, OpenTable, and TripAdvisor.

Closure activity affected independent restaurants and chain locations, although the distribution was not equal. Independent establishments accounted for 13,265 closures, compared with 2,712 chain restaurant closures. This difference partly reflects the much larger number of independent restaurants operating in the United States and the higher rate of business formation, ownership changes, concept turnover, and individual location closures within the independent segment.

Reports about restaurant closures can create the impression that the industry is contracting uniformly. The underlying market is more complex. A restaurant may close while another opens nearby, a location may reopen under a different concept, or an operator may close an underperforming unit while continuing to develop locations in other markets.

The first six months of 2024 recorded the following quarterly restaurant closure totals:

Period Total Closures Chain Closures Independent Closures
Q1 2024: January–March 7,021
Q2 2024: April–June 8,956
H1 2024 Total 15,977 2,712 13,265

The chain-versus-independent breakdown applies to the full first-half 2024 total. Separate chain and independent counts were not available for the individual quarters. Source: RestaurantData.com analysis of Yelp, Google Maps, OpenTable, and TripAdvisor data.

Why Restaurant Closure Counts Require Verification

Restaurant closure counts are more difficult to verify than they may initially appear. Online business listings can remain active after a restaurant closes, while temporary closures, renovations, seasonal shutdowns, ownership changes, and rebranding can create conflicting status information across platforms.

A restaurant marked closed on one platform may still appear open on another. In other cases, the restaurant may have ceased operating while the location remains active under a new name or concept. RestaurantData therefore reviews closure information across multiple sources rather than relying on a single directory or platform.

The figures in this report represent identified location closures, not bankruptcies, company failures, or permanent exits by every restaurant operator associated with those locations. A company may close one restaurant while continuing to operate or expand elsewhere.

What the Closure Numbers Indicate

The increase from 7,021 restaurant closures in the first quarter to 8,956 in the second quarter represented a quarterly change of approximately 27%. The difference should not automatically be interpreted as evidence of a long-term national closure surge because quarter-to-quarter restaurant activity can be influenced by seasonal operating patterns, lease timing, ownership decisions, delayed status updates, and normal location turnover.

The simultaneous pace of hundreds of new restaurant openings each week also shows why openings and closures should be evaluated together. The U.S. restaurant market was continuing to add new locations even as other establishments ceased operating.

Restaurant openings and closures can occur for different reasons across operator categories. Independent restaurant closures may reflect individual business conditions, lease changes, retirement, ownership transfers, financing limitations, or concept performance. Chain closures may be part of portfolio reviews, market exits, franchise changes, relocations, or broader restructuring programs.

RestaurantData organizes recent company development activity through the Expansion Pressure Index™ . The index evaluates verified expansion activity across growing restaurant companies and helps distinguish sustained development from isolated location announcements.

Restaurant Development by Company Size

The relationship between openings and closures also differs by company size. Small restaurant operators may add or close one location at a time, making each event significant to the overall company. Larger restaurant organizations can open and close multiple units during the same period as they adjust their market portfolios.

A closure by a large restaurant company does not necessarily indicate that the organization has stopped expanding. Enterprise operators may close mature or underperforming locations while opening restaurants in different markets, acquiring additional concepts, changing franchise relationships, or shifting investment toward other brands.

The Restaurant Enterprise Index™ examines larger restaurant companies, franchise organizations, multi-concept operators, and enterprise ownership groups, generally covering organizations responsible for 100 or more restaurant units.

How RestaurantData Identifies Opening Activity

RestaurantData researches new restaurant development through a continuing review of alcohol-license applications, business registrations, assumed-name filings, construction permits, planning records, zoning documents, company announcements, local reporting, and direct verification.

A filing or development signal is not automatically classified as a completed opening. Records are reviewed as additional information becomes available, including operating status, expected opening dates, ownership relationships, concept names, addresses, construction progress, and company affiliations.

Additional methodology papers, market analyses, cross-tab reports, executive-movement studies, opening research, closure analysis, and company-level research are organized within the RestaurantData Research Center .

Related Restaurant Market Research

U.S. Restaurant Opening Cross-Tab Analysis: January–June 2026

A semi-annual review of verified restaurant opening activity by operator type, geography, development period, and restaurant category.

Restaurant Opening Signals Report

A review of restaurant development signals identified through licensing records, construction activity, company filings, local reporting, and continuing verification.

March–May Restaurant Openings: Analysis of 2,698 Projects

An analysis of verified restaurant development projects, including activity by market, operator type, cuisine, and development pattern.

U.S. New Restaurant Openings Research

An overview of RestaurantData’s coverage of pre-opening restaurant projects involving independent operators, franchisees, regional groups, and larger restaurant companies.

Review New Restaurant Openings in Your Market

RestaurantData researches hundreds of new restaurant openings and development projects each week across the United States. Coverage includes independent operators, franchisees, regional restaurant groups, and larger restaurant companies.

Request Access

Usage & Distribution Terms

This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis.

Preferred citation: Source: RestaurantData.com, U.S. Restaurant Landscape: Key Numbers and Trends, data as of August 1, 2024.

“`