Restaurant Opening Signals Report: 1,188 Filings Across 49 States
Signals Report
Key Observations
Volume moderates but Texas dominance holds
Total filings declined to 1,188 from 1,525 the prior period, a 22% drop consistent with typical mid-period variation. Texas recorded 357 filings, representing 30% of the national total. Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston-Galveston, and the Austin/San Antonio corridor together account for most of the state’s volume.
Casual dining reasserts its lead
Casual/family concepts returned to 50% of all filings, recovering from 43% last period as quick serve held steady at 22%. Fast casual and quick serve remain close, reflecting continued format-level competition in the mid-market.
New York surges to fourth, South Carolina enters the top ten
New York posted 144 filings, driven by significant Brooklyn-Queens-Staten Island activity. South Carolina entered the top ten at 21 filings, with a below-average single-unit share indicating stronger chain presence relative to other top-ten states.
Single-unit share softens slightly
748 of 1,188 filings, or 63%, are independent and single-unit owner/operators with no known chain or multi-unit affiliation, down from the prior two periods. Nevada and New York reached the highest single-unit shares among the top ten states, while South Carolina and Texas remained lower.
Anchored retail environments maintain their hold
Mixed-use and shopping center locations account for 850 filings combined, or 72%, the highest anchored share across the periods tracked. Freestanding locations fell to 226, or 19%.
Top 5 States
Service Type Distribution
Top 10 States by Service Type
Casual/family dining leads across all states, returning to its prior share after an uptick in quick serve last period. Texas continues to post the highest QSR volume. South Carolina enters the top ten for the first time.
| State | Total | Casual | Fast Casual | QSR | Upscale | Other / Unclassified | Single Unit % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TX | 357 | 126 | 72 | 85 | 7 | 67 | 54% |
| CA | 208 | 109 | 42 | 22 | 8 | 27 | 74% |
| FL | 172 | 77 | 45 | 42 | 2 | 6 | 66% |
| NY | 144 | 76 | 27 | 30 | 4 | 7 | 82% |
| NC | 47 | 21 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 62% |
| GA | 29 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 52% |
| OH | 29 | 15 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 61% |
| LA | 23 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 78% |
| NV | 23 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 82% |
| SC | 21 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 48% |
Note: “Other / Unclassified” includes service formats outside the listed categories or records where service type was not fully classified at publication.
Chain Activity Summary
The public version of this report withholds brand-level names. Across the reporting period, chain activity was concentrated in a relatively small group of active operators, with multiple new-location filings appearing among fast casual, quick serve, and casual dining concepts.
Brand-level names are withheld from this public summary; the client version includes the full company-level detail, brand names, location signals, and related market context.
Top 5 Regions
The prevailing new-opening profile for this three-week period is a casual or family-dining concept operated by a single-unit owner in a mixed-use or shopping center setting in a Texas, California, or Florida market. Volume moderated from the prior period but the structural patterns are consistent: Texas dominates by a wide margin, anchored retail environments account for nearly three in four filings, and the independent operator share, while slightly softer at 63%, remains the clear majority.
Chain Activity & Market Intelligence
New Locations & Trading Area Changes
164 net new chain location signals across 144 cities, plus 103 trading area additions and 176 market exits. Chain names are not disclosed in this public summary. Texas leads new location activity, with Leander recording the most signals of any single city this period.
New Location Signals
Multiple-signal cities: Leander, Austin, Katy, San Antonio, Cedar Park, Conroe, Fort Lauderdale, Georgetown, Hillsboro, Knoxville, Louisville, Sugar Land, and Temple.
Additional activity: Single-location chain signals were also tracked across Texas, Florida, California, and a broad group of other U.S. markets.
Trading Area Changes
Areas entered: NC, SC, TX, GA, CA, KY, MA, OH, VA
Areas exited: FL, IN, KS, IL, LA, NC, NY, TX, VA
Personnel Changes
RestaurantData.com tracked 106 personnel changes across 68 organizations during the reporting period. This public version consolidates the activity by functional area and does not disclose organization names.
Classification Notes
The analyses in this report examine the same reporting period from different perspectives, including state, region, service type, operator type, location setting, chain activity, and trading-area movement. Tables summarize their respective categories and may include “Other / Unclassified” records where a service format falls outside the listed categories or was not fully classified at publication.
Explore More Restaurant Opening Research
For additional context on restaurant opening activity, market signals, and RestaurantData.com’s research process, the following reports provide broader historical analysis, detailed examples, and answers to frequently asked questions.
Restaurant Opening Cross-Tab Analysis (2020–2025) examines six years of restaurant opening trends by geography, cuisine, service type, operator size, and location characteristics, providing long-term perspective on the patterns summarized in this Signals Report.
Restaurant Brand Alerts – May 2026 (Week 1) highlights verified restaurant opening activity from a single reporting period, including new restaurant projects, expanding brands, ownership changes, and the early market signals identified through RestaurantData.com’s ongoing nationwide research.
March–May Restaurant Openings Report (2,698 Projects) provides a broader three-month analysis covering 2,698 restaurant projects, including new openings, ownership transfers, reopenings, relocations, operator size, service type, cuisine trends, location characteristics, and regional growth patterns.
Questions about how RestaurantData.com identifies and verifies restaurant openings? Visit the Pre-Opening Restaurant Leads FAQs to learn more about the research methodology, data verification process, report contents, and how companies use the information for sales, market research, and business development.
Continue Your Research
This article is part of the RestaurantData Research Center, where RestaurantData publishes research based on verified restaurant openings, expansion activity, executive changes, operator records, and market intelligence.
The Research Center brings together RestaurantData reports, methodologies, and analysis in one place for readers following restaurant industry development and company movement.
Usage & Distribution Terms
This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis, provided that full attribution is given to Restaurantdata.com and no modifications are made to the data, findings, tables, charts, or conclusions.
No resale, republication as a paid product, database extraction, scraping, data harvesting, bulk copying, or use of this report to create or enhance a competing commercial database, lead product, market research product, or restaurant intelligence platform is permitted without prior written consent from Restaurantdata.com.
Preferred citation: “Source: Restaurantdata.com, U.S. New Restaurant Openings Report, published June 25, 2026.”