Skip to content

Restaurant Closures: Google and Yelp Star Ratings- The Brutal Truth

Google and Yelp Star Ratings of Closed Restaurants: What the Data Shows

Restaurantdata.com analyzed Google and Yelp star ratings for restaurants that closed during the previous quarter and compared them with restaurants that remained open. Almost all of the closed restaurants were rated below 4 stars, while 87% of the restaurants that remained open held a rating of 4 stars or better. The comparison shows a pronounced relationship between public review ratings and restaurant operating status.

Key findings: Almost all of the restaurant closures examined occurred among locations rated below 4 stars on Google and Yelp. By comparison, 87% of the restaurants that remained open maintained a rating of 4 stars or higher. Across the locations studied, sub-4-star ratings were strongly associated with closure.

The Brutal Truth: Ratings and Restaurant Survival

The difference between the ratings of closed and operating restaurants was substantial. Restaurantdata.com’s analysis of locations that closed during the prior quarter found a consistent pattern across Google and Yelp:

  • Restaurants that closed: Almost all were rated below 4 stars on both Google and Yelp at the time of the analysis.
  • Restaurants that remained open: 87% maintained a rating of 4 stars or better across the review platforms examined.
  • Rating threshold: The largest separation between the two groups occurred at the 4-star level.

Average Google and Yelp Ratings Across the Top 20 States

The table below shows average Google and Yelp ratings for closed restaurant locations across the 20 states with the highest closure volume in the analysis. Yelp ratings were generally higher than Google ratings within this group, although the size of the difference varied by state.

Source: Restaurantdata.com · Analysis of closed restaurant locations · Google and Yelp rating data · Top 20 states by closure volume

# State Google Rating (Avg) Yelp Rating (Avg)
1 Alaska (AK) ~3.8 ~3.9
2 Illinois (IL) ~3.6 ~3.9
3 Missouri (MO) ~3.1 ~3.9
4 Indiana (IN) ~3.5 ~3.9
5 Alabama (AL) ~3.5 ~3.9
6 Washington (WA) ~3.1 ~3.9
7 Kentucky (KY) ~3.5 ~3.9
8 Colorado (CO) ~3.5 ~3.9
9 California (CA) ~3.6 ~3.9
10 Connecticut (CT) ~3.6 ~3.9
11 Iowa (IA) ~3.6 ~3.9
12 Kansas (KS) ~3.6 ~3.9
13 Arizona (AZ) ~3.7 ~3.9
14 Idaho (ID) ~3.3 ~3.9
15 Maine (ME) ~3.6 ~4.0
16 Arkansas (AR) ~3.6 ~4.0
17 New Hampshire (NH) ~2.7 ~4.0
18 Montana (MT) ~3.0 ~4.0
19 South Dakota (SD) ~3.6 ~4.0
20 Mississippi (MS) ~3.2 ~4.0

* Ratings are approximate and were read from the underlying chart data. Figures represent average ratings for closed restaurant locations in each state. Yelp ratings were higher than Google ratings across most states included in this dataset.

What the Rating Gap Shows

Public ratings provide a visible measure of customer experience, but they should not be read as the sole cause of a restaurant closure. Restaurants close for many reasons, including operating costs, lease conditions, ownership changes, capitalization, staffing, competition, and changes in local demand. Within this analysis, however, lower ratings appeared far more frequently among closed restaurants than among those that remained open.

For foodservice suppliers, distributors, and vendors, the distinction can add context when reviewing existing accounts or evaluating restaurant companies. A sustained rating below 4 stars may warrant closer review when considered alongside ownership changes, declining location counts, payment history, or other operating signals.

New restaurants present a different stage of the business cycle because they have not yet accumulated a meaningful body of public reviews. Restaurantdata.com follows these businesses through permits, filings, development activity, and verified openings. Additional context is available in the U.S. Restaurant Openings and Closures analysis and the overview of weekly pre-opening restaurant research and the existing restaurant database.

Restaurant Opening Research

Restaurantdata.com tracks verified restaurant development and new opening activity across the United States. Records are researched before or near opening and include independent operators, small restaurant groups, regional companies, franchise organizations, and national chains.

Request Access →

Continue Your Research

This article is part of the RestaurantData Research Center, where RestaurantData publishes research based on verified restaurant openings, closures, expansion activity, executive changes, operator records, and restaurant market intelligence.

The Research Center brings together RestaurantData reports, methodologies, historical comparisons, and market analysis for readers following restaurant industry development and company movement.

Usage & Distribution Terms

This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis.

Preferred citation: “Source: Restaurantdata.com, Google and Yelp Star Ratings of Closed Restaurants: What the Data Shows.”

Restaurant POS by market share, Next 5 US markets – Atlanta, Washington, Phoenix, Miami, Detroit, Riverside

Which POS Systems Lead Across These 6 Metro Markets?

This report analyzes restaurant POS system market share across six major U.S. metropolitan areas ranked #6 through #10 by restaurant market size. Data is drawn from primary research across 3,155 unique restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units, covering 23,526 total locations across Atlanta, Washington, Phoenix, Miami, Detroit, and Riverside.

Top 3 findings: NCR/Aloha holds the largest share at 30.18%. In-House/Proprietary ranks second at 20.81%. Oracle/Micros ranks third at 15.60%. The top 10 POS systems account for 84.24% of installs across these markets. See also: Top 5 MSA POS Installs →

Key Market Observations

Atlanta is the largest of the six markets with 5,369 top-10 POS installs, followed by Washington at 4,341. Riverside and Detroit follow at 3,208 and 2,934 installs.

NCR/Aloha leads every market in this group, ranging from 1,853 units in Atlanta to 745 in Riverside. Its lead over In-House/Proprietary systems is widest in Atlanta and Washington.

Toast has its highest count in Washington at 332 units. Focus has its highest count in Atlanta at 456 units.

In-House/Proprietary systems remain material across all six markets. The category reflects larger restaurant chains and multi-unit operators using custom or internally managed technology stacks.

Top 10 POS Systems Combined Market Share Across All 6 Metros

The table below shows combined unit counts and market share percentages for the top 10 POS systems across Atlanta, Washington, Phoenix, Miami, Detroit, and Riverside.

Source: RestaurantData.com Fall 2024 POS Survey · Metro areas ranked #6–10 by restaurant market size · Chains with 5+ units · Survey ending August 15, 2024

# POS System Total Units % Share
1 NCR / Aloha 7,100 30.18%
2 In-House / Proprietary 4,895 20.81%
3 Oracle / Micros 3,671 15.60%
4 PAR 1,891 8.04%
5 Toast 1,594 6.78%
6 Focus 1,591 6.76%
7 Poseidon 1,283 5.45%
8 QU 621 2.64%
9 Clover 530 2.25%
10 Revel 350 1.49%
Top 10 Total 23,526 84.24%

* Market share percentages are calculated from total installs across all six metro areas combined. NCR/Voyix operates under the Aloha brand in restaurant POS.

POS Installs by Metro Area Detailed Breakdown

The table below shows unit counts for each of the top 10 POS systems across all six metropolitan markets.

POS System Atlanta Washington Phoenix Miami Detroit Riverside Totals
NCR / Aloha 1,853 1,372 1,197 1,185 748 745 7,100
In-House / Proprietary 1,135 890 686 788 765 631 4,895
Oracle / Micros 744 676 656 604 427 564 3,671
PAR 288 288 372 228 342 373 1,891
Toast 286 332 218 277 198 283 1,594
Focus 456 284 257 230 146 218 1,591
Poseidon 282 189 233 215 182 182 1,283
QU 173 88 126 101 54 79 621
Clover 58 148 89 82 54 99 530
Revel 94 74 78 52 18 34 350
Top 10 Totals 5,369 4,341 3,912 3,762 2,934 3,208 23,526

* Unit counts reflect restaurant locations using each POS system within chains operating 5 or more units. Data is sourced from primary telephone interviews and in-store visits conducted by RestaurantData.com researchers. Survey ending August 15, 2024. Revised September 10, 2024 for brands where franchisees can choose their own POS.

Survey Methodology

  • Total brands surveyed: 3,155 unique restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units
  • Results obtained: 2,391 brands responded
  • Penetration success rate: 75.8%
  • Survey duration: 4 months, ending August 15, 2024
  • Recent revisions: Edits and changes for brands where franchisees can choose their own POS, September 10, 2024
  • Method: Telephone interviews and in-store visits; each brand contacted at least twice, up to 8 calls where needed

More Restaurant POS Market Research

RestaurantData tracks POS system usage across restaurant chains, multi-unit operators, franchise systems, and regional restaurant groups. The reports below provide additional views of POS market share, install counts, provider changes, and metro-level restaurant technology coverage.

Usage and Distribution Terms

This report may be shared and distributed on a non-exclusive, royalty-free basis.

Preferred citation: “Source: RestaurantData.com, Restaurant POS Market Share Across Atlanta, Washington, Phoenix, Miami, Detroit, and Riverside, published on the original publication date shown on this page.”

Top 25 POS Systems in Quick Service and Fast Casual Restaurants

Which POS Systems Lead Quick Service and Fast Casual Restaurants?

RestaurantData.com surveyed 1,840 unique counter service restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units across the U.S. and Canada to rank the top 25 POS systems by location installations. The research focuses exclusively on quick service and fast casual concepts. The counter service segment that represents the largest and fastest-growing tier of the U.S. restaurant industry.

Have a quota? Sell against a particular POS brand? Integrate with a POS partner? We have the HQs, locations, and contacts using POS tech across every major counter service chain. Contact us to improve your sales outreach →

Survey Overview

This survey is one of the most comprehensive independent studies of POS installations in the counter service segment ever conducted. Unlike vendor-reported figures, all data comes from direct primary research along with telephone interviews and in-store visits.

  • Total brands surveyed: 1,840 unique counter service restaurant brands with 5 or more operating units
  • Results obtained: 1,334 brands responded
  • Overall penetration success rate: 72.0%
  • Penetration rate in brands with 20+ locations: 96.8%
  • Survey duration: 4 months, ending August 15, 2024
  • Total research cycle (including absorption and integration): 7 months
  • Note: Franchisees of brands were not included to avoid duplication

Research Methodology

RestaurantData.com researchers conducted telephone interviews and made on-site location visits to verify POS usage at each brand. Each unique brand was contacted at least twice, with up to four calls. And even more if necessary to obtain a confirmed response. Staff members were interviewed by telephone and in-store visitations were made where possible.

Some companies operate with multiple POS systems, while others are in the process of transitioning to a new one. Since research captures a specific moment in time, results may vary as the market evolves. The next analysis is currently in progress, with updated results expected within 60 days, 70% faster than the previous cycle.

The survey covers the U.S. and Canada, ranking the top 25 counter service POS companies by the number of units with the most location installations across brands with 5 or more operating units.

Why Counter Service POS is today’s great focus for most sellers

Quick service and fast casual represent the most active segments for new restaurant openings, franchise expansion, and POS technology adoption. Understanding which systems dominate; and where market share is shifting. Critical intelligence for:

  • POS vendors and resellers targeting competitive displacement or new account development
  • Technology integrators identifying which POS platforms to prioritize for partnership and certification
  • Food service suppliers and distributors targeting chains by technology stack
  • Private equity and investment firms evaluating POS market consolidation opportunities
  • Restaurant operators benchmarking their current POS against what competitors are using

Related POS Research from RestaurantData.com

This survey is part of RestaurantData.com’s ongoing POS research series covering the full U.S. and Canadian restaurant market. Related reports include:

Want the Full Top 25 POS Rankings for QSR and Fast Casual?

The complete ranked list of the top 25 POS systems in counter service restaurants — with unit counts, chain counts, and market share percentages — is available to RestaurantData.com clients. Contact us to request the data or learn about ongoing POS tracking for your target segment.

Request the Full Rankings →